• Nan Zakiah Megat Ibrahim Pusat Pengajian Teknologi Multimedia dan Komunikasi, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010, Sintok Kedah, Malaysia
  • Che Su Mustaffa Pusat Pengajian Teknologi Multimedia dan Komunikasi, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010, Sintok Kedah, Malaysia
  • Mohd Khairie Ahmad Pusat Pengajian Teknologi Multimedia dan Komunikasi, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010, Sintok Kedah, Malaysia



Faktor niat keinginan merupakan faktor yang menyumbang kepada penyertaan dalam latihan. Walau bagaimanapun, kajian-kajian lepas telah membuktikan bahawa masih kurang kajian yang membuktikan bahawa niat dan keinginan menjadi faktor penyumbang kepada penyertaan, Oleh yang demikian, kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti hubungan di antara niat dan keinginan dengan penyertaan dalam latihan. Kajian ini mengaplikasikan kaedah kuantitatif melalui kaedah tinjauan dengan menggunakan soal selidik. Responden yang terlibat dalam kajian ini terdiri daripada peserta latihan keusahawanan ICT yang dianjurkan oleh pihak MARA di Terengganu. Seramai 373 responden yang terlibat bagi tujuan kajian ini. Dapatan kajian mendapati terdapat hubungan yang signifikan di antara niat dan keinginan dengan penyertaan dalam latihan. Secara keseluruhannya kajian menyumbang kepada bidang komunikasi melalui pembentukan pemboleh ubah yang lebih komprehensif berkaitan dengan penyertaan dalam latihan dan membantu memperkembangkan lagi teori dengan kepelbagaian isu berkaitan.


Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. (1990). Trying to consume. Environmental concern: conceptual definitions methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 19: 369-382.

Bagozzi, R. P. & Dholakia, U. M. (2002) Intentional social action in virtual communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing 16 (2), 2-21.

Balasubramanian, S., & Mahajan, V. (2001). The economic leverage of the virtual community. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(3), 103–138.

Dreyer, F. (2007). Disappointments Of Participation: Finding The Correct Role For Community Participation. World Development. 17 (4), 629-649.

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Forthworth, TX7 Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Franke, N. & Piller, F. (2003). Key Research Issues in User Interaction with Configuration Toolkits in a Mass Customization System. The International Journal of Technology Management, 26 (5/6), 578-599.

Friedman, S. (1998): The still elusive community: municipal investment and ‘community participation’. In: DBSA: The Impact of Infrastructure Investment on Poverty Reduction and Human Development. Midrand. Discussion Paper No. 4.

Fuchs, C. (2006). eParticipation research: a case study on political

online debate in Austriaâ€, Research Paper No. 1, ICT&S Center at the

University of Salzburg, Salzburg, 1-26.

Gronlund, A. & Horan, T. (2005). Introducing e-GOV: history, definitions and issues, Communications of the AIS. 15. 713-29.

Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996, July). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60, 50–68.

Ojala, M. (2012). Hope and climate change: the importance of hope for proenvironmental engagement among young people. Environmental

Education Research, 18, 625-642.

Liotas, N. & Tarabanis, K. (2007). A framework for Assessing eParticipation Projects and Tools, Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

Lombard, M. (2001). Interactive advertising and presence: A

framework. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(2). (http://

Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing eparticipation in policy-making.

Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System

Sciences (HICSS’04) – Track 5, January 5-8, 1-10.

Macintosh, A., & Whyte., E. (2008). Providing argument support for eparticipation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 6, 43--59.

Michener, V. (1998). The Participatory Approach: Contradiction and CoOptation in Burkina Faso. World Development, 26 (12), 2105-18.

Mohan, R. (2015). Participation: from tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development, Zed, London.

Ostermus, T. L. (1997). Pro-Social Consumer Influence Strategies: When and How Do They Work? Journal of Marketing, 61(4): 16-29.

Pavlou, P. A. & Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and predicting

electronic commerce adoption: an extension of the theory of planned

behavior. MISQuarterly, 30(1), 115–143.

Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2001). The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviors: A model of goal-directed behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 79–98.

Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations, (1st ed.), New York: The Free Press.

Rogers, E.M. & Shoemaker, F.F. (1971). Communication of innovations: A cultural Approach. New York: The Free Press.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th Ed.), New York, USA: The Free Press.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students. 4th ed. London: Prentice Hall.

Scheir, M. & Prugl, R. (2008). Extending Lead-User Theory: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers’ Lead Userness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 331-346.

Secher, C. (2006). Towards understanding e-participation from an

institutional perspectiveâ€, Demo-Net – The Participation Network: European Research Workshop: In Conjunction with the 7th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, Venice. 7-9.

Taylor, S & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing it usage: the role of prior experience, MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-70.

Tornatzky, L.G. & Klein, K.J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and

innovation-adoption implementation: a meta-analysis of findings, IEEE

Transactions on Engineering Management, 28-45, EM-29.

Trope, Y. & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal Construal. Psychological

Review, 110 (3). 403-21.

Tuomela, R. (1995). The importance of us: A philosophy study of basic social notions. Stanford, CA7 Stanford University Press

Usoro, A. Sharratt, M. W. Tsui, E. & Shekhar, S. (2007). Trust as an

antecedent to knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice.

KnowledgeManagement Research & Practice, 5(3), 199–212.

Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2014). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives.

Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535.

von Hippel, E. & Katz, R. (2002). Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits. Management Science, 48(7), 821-833.

Wasko, M. M. & Faraj, S. (2000). "It is what one does": Why people

participate and help others in electronic communities of practice.

Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 155-173.

Wrightsen, C. (2009). The next generation of collective action

research. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 859-879.




How to Cite

Megat Ibrahim, N. Z., Mustaffa, C. S., & Ahmad, M. K. (2017). NIAT DAN KEINGINAN DENGAN PENYERTAAN DALAM LATIHAN KEUSAHAWANAN: PERKAITAN ANTARA FAKTOR. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 14(3). Retrieved from