Integration of Electronic Data Interchange: A Review

Authors

  • Gengeswari K Faculty of Management and Human Resource Development Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Abu Bakar Abdul Hamid Faculty of Management and Human Resource Development Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Abstract

Abstract

The implementation of electronic data interchange (EDI) has been claimed to be vital for the success of international trade, as it requires bundle of data exchanges between many parties across geographical boundaries. Numerous literatures have argued that EDI could yield enormous benefits provided that there is integration into other business applications as well as with company’s trading partners. Nevertheless, due to many barriers during the implementation process, EDI often stagnant with a single set of transactions without further integration. On the other hand, literatures revealed further that most of the companies that were imposed by government or larger trading partners to implement EDI are reluctant to integrate it into other business applications. This paper discusses EDI integration by referring to its benefits, inhibitors and determinants based on the literatures and findings of the preliminary works. Accordingly, a research model has been built where the effectiveness of the model is demonstrated by the development of thirteen propositions that could be tested in practice.

References

Angeles, R., Ravinder Nath and Hendon, W.D. (1998). An empirical investigation of the level electronic data interchange (EDI) implementation and its ability to predict EDI system success measures and EDI implementation factors. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics. 28(9): 773-793.

Bergeron, F. and Raymond, L. (1997). Managing EDI for corporate advantage: a longitudinal study. Information and Management. 31: 319-333

Business Times. Customs electronic clearing system set to go nationwide by December. 26/11/03.

Chau, Y.K. (2001). Inhibitors to EDI adoption in small businesses: an empirical investigation. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research. 2(2): 78-88.

Chau, Y.K. and Jim, C.F. (2002). Adoption of Electronic Data Interchange in small and medium enterprises. Journal of Global Information Management. 10(4): 61-85.

Elbaz, D. (1998). Electronic Data Interchange: an assessment of the factors leading to EDI adoption. Concordia University: Master Thesis.

Emmelhainz, M.A. (1994). Electronic Data Interchange in logistics. In: Robeson, F.J. and Copacino C.W. (1994). The Logistics Handbook. New York: The Free Press. 737- 766.

Fawcett, S.E., Magnan, G.M. and McCarter, M.W. (2005). Benchmarking information integration in supply chain management: a multi-channel approach.

Holmes, T.L. and Srivastava, R. (1999). Effects of rationalism and readiness on EDI collaboration and outcomes. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing. 14(5): 390-402

Iacovou, C.L., Benbasat, I. and Dexter, A.S. (1995). Electronic Data Interchange and small organizations: adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quarterly. 19(4): 465-485.

Jun, M. and Cai, S. (2003). Key Obstacles to EDI Success: from the US small manufacturing companies’ perspective. Industrial Management and Data Systems. 103(3): 192-203.

Jun, M., Cai, M. and Peterson, R.T. (2000). EDI use and participation models: from the interorganizational relationship perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 100 (9): 412 – 420.

Knoppers, J. (1992). Results of the work of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on the "Open-EDI conceptual Model" and its Importance for EDI Developments.

Kurokawa, S. and Manabe, S. (2002). Determinants of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) adoption and integration in the US and Japanese automobile suppliers.

Leng Ang,C., Razman, M.T. and Rusdi, M. (2003). An empirical study on electronic commerce diffusion in the Malaysian shipping industry. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries. 14(1): 1-9

Mahfuzah Kamsah and Wood-Harper, A.T. (1997). A multi-theoretical framework for the study of EDI diffusion in Malaysia. Management of Technology for Industrialization Malaysian Science and Technology Congress, 97.16-17 October. Johor, Malaysia.

McNurlin, B.C. (1987). The rise of co-operative systems. EDP Analyzer. 25(6): 1-16.

Morell, J.A., Neal, W. and Fries, V. (1995). Promoting Electronic Data Interchange: building a foundation for support to small businesses. Industrial Technology Institute.

MIDA Annual Media Conference(2004). The performance of the manufacturing sector in 2003.

Ngai, E.W.T. and Gunasekaran, A. (2004). Implementation of EDI in Hong Kong: an empirical analysis. Industrial Management and Data Systems. 104(1): 88-100.

Sanchez, A.M. and Perez, M.P. (2003).The use of EDI for interorganizational co-operation and co-ordination in the supply chain. Integrated Manufacturing Systems. 14(8): 642- 651.

Strait Shipper. Stop fiddling around, EDI player told. 27/3/95.

Swatman, P.M.C and Swatman, P.A. (1991). The strategic importance of integrating Electronic Data Interchange into the organization’s systems. “ICIS ‘90†Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Information Systems. December 16- 18. New York,: 141-152

Tuunainen, V.K. (1998). Opportunities of effective integration of EDI for small businesses in the automotive industry. Information & Management. 36 (6): 361-375.

Vega, L., Salvador, R. and Guerra, L. (1996). Determinants and outcomes of Electronic Data Interchange integration.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-06

How to Cite

K, G., & Abdul Hamid, A. B. (2017). Integration of Electronic Data Interchange: A Review. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 8(1). Retrieved from https://jurnalkemanusiaan.utm.my/index.php/kemanusiaan/article/view/73

Issue

Section

Articles