TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND ACADEMIA-INDUSTRY LINKAGES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: CASE OF PAKISTAN

Authors

  • Shaista Noor Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru,Malaysia
  • Kamariah Ismail UTM Technology Entrepreneurship Centre, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Johor-Bahru-Malaysia
  • Sameetah Ali Faculty of Management, Shaheed Zufikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science & Technology Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Farhat Ajmal Faculty of Biosciences, Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan

Abstract

Technological innovations are altering the business operations and structural framework of industries across the globe. In this regard, academia-industry linkage has played a significant role in strengthening the industrial sector in west. Observing the success of west based on academic commercialization, there is extensive emphasis on academia-industry linkage in other countries all over the world. China, India, Malaysia are among those Asian countries that are striving hard to make effective academia-industry linkages. Pakistan like other South Asian countries is far behind in filling this gap of academia-industry linkage as technology transfer is possible through strong academia & industrial linkage. Innovation and technology developments in universities contribute for the welfare of nations. Industries like Biotechnology, Pharmaceuticals and Information Technology can excel through academic commercialization and gain insight of technological innovations. The study revealed different aspects of university industry linkages. Industrialists and academicians have taken part in the study through structured focus group strategy and suggested a framework to build strong and effective academia-industry relationship.

References

Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z (2000) Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papersin Regional Science 79: 435–445.

Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., Uzzi, B., 2000a. Athena unbound: the advancement of women in science and technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P., 2002. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48, 1–23.

Bramwell, Allison, Wolfe, David A. (2008). Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy, 37, 75-87

Gulbrandsen, M., Slipersæter, S., 2007. The third mission and the entrepreneurial university model. In: Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C. (Eds.), Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation: Specialization and Performance in Europe. Edward Elgar,Cheltenham, pp. 112–143.

Robertson, S. and F. Kitigawa 2009. ‘Understanding knowledge mediation strategies in university incubators: from policy to practice, and back again', Unpublished research paper, LLAKES, University of Bristol.

Vernon, J. 2010. ‘The end of the public university in England’, Global HigherEd (http://globalhighere d.wordpress.com/).Thrift, N. 2011. ‘Across the world: the privatization of higher education’, The Chronicle of Higher Education (http://chronicle.com/blogs/worldwise/author/nthrift/page/5).

Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P., 2002. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48, 1–23.

Bozeman B (2000) Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy 29:627–655.

Jaffe A (1989) Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review 79: 957–978.

Varga A (1998) University research and regional innovation: A spatial econometric analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.

Molas-Gallart, J., A. Salter, P. Patel, A. Scott and X. Duran 2002. Measuring third stream activities: final report to the Russell Group of universities, Science and Technology Policy Research Unit,University of Sussex, April.

Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Technological accumulation and industrial growth: contrasts between developed and developing countries.In D. Archibugi & J. Michie (Eds.), Technology, globalization and economic performance (pp. 83–137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gereffi, G. (1995). Global production systems and Third World development. In Global change, regional response: The new international context of development. Cambridge: University Press.

Liefner, I., & Schiller, D. (2008). Academic capabilities in developing countries—A conceptual framework with empirical illustrations from Thailand. Research Policy, 37(2), 276–293.

Vega-Jurado, J., Ferna´ndez-de-Lucio, I., & Huanca, R. (2008). University—Industry relations in Bolivia:Implications for university transformations in Latin America. Higher Education, 56 (2), 205–220.

HEC (2011-2015). Medium Term Development Framework II, MTDF – HE II, Higher Education Commission Pakistan.

Ministry of Education Malaysia Official Portal (MOE) KPM, www.moe.gov.my/en/home.

Arabella Bhutto, Pir Irfanullah Rashdi and Qazi Moinuddin Abro (2012). Indicators for Science and Technology in Pakistan: Entering the science, technology and innovation paradigm, Science and Public Policy, 39, pp. 1-12

Pakistan: Entering the science, technology and innovation paradigm, Science and Public Policy, 39, pp. 1-12.

HEC (2013). Task Force on Improvement of Higher Education in Pakistan. Annual Report, Higher Education Commission Pakistan.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-06

How to Cite

Noor, S., Ismail, K., Ali, S., & Ajmal, F. (2017). TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND ACADEMIA-INDUSTRY LINKAGES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: CASE OF PAKISTAN. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 13(3). Retrieved from https://jurnalkemanusiaan.utm.my/index.php/kemanusiaan/article/view/55

Issue

Section

Articles