ACADEMIC RESEARCH COMMERCIALIZATION IN PAKISTAN: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES

Authors

  • Shaista Noor Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Kamariah Ismail UTM Technology Entrepreneurship Centre, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Ahmed Arif Faculty of Management, Shaheed Zufikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science & Technology Islamabad, Pakistan

Abstract

Commercialization of academic research is considered as main tool of trade and industry growth in developed and developing countries. The growth of third mission activities in higher education institutions mainly aims at commercialization of academic research and entrepreneurial platform creation, in order to bridge the gaps between industry and academia. Innovation is the first commercial application of academic research commercialization. The purpose of this paper is to identify the current challenges and barriers that Pakistan’s Higher Education Institutions are facing in commercialization activities. In this present study Delphi method is used to find out the main challenges and solutions for academic research commercialization in Pakistan. Analysis has been constructed according to the current situation of the issue. Finally, the paper concludes with the discussion of research findings.

References

Adler, M. & Ziglio. E. (1996). Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi Method and its application to social policy and public health. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Rowe, G. & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353 – 375.

Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z (2000). Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papersin Regional Science, 79: 435–445

Beech B.F. (1997). Studying the future: a Delphi survey of how multi-disciplinary clinical staff view the likely development of two community mental health centers over the course of the next two years. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 331-338.

Etzkowitz, H., 2003. Research groups as ‘Quasi-Firms’: The invention of the Entrepreneurial University. Research Policy, 32: 109-121

Browne, J. (2010). Securing a suitable future for higher education. An independent review of higher education funding and studentfinance.http://www.independent.gov.uk/browne-report.by universities , African Journal of Business Management Vol. 5(17), 7198-7208

Gulbrandsen, M., Slipersæter, S., 2007. The third mission and the entrepreneurial university model. In: Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C. (Eds.), Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation: Specialization and Performance in Europe. Edward Elgar,Cheltenham, pp.112–143

Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P., 2002. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48, 1–23

Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff, 2000. The dynamicsof innovation: From National Systems and ‘‘Mode 2â€to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29:109-123.

Bozeman B (2000) Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy 29:627–655

GCI (2013). The Global Competitiveness Index 2013–2014: Country Profile Highlights. World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland.

Juri, P. (1971). The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 5(1), 57-71. doi: 10.1016/0038-0121(71)90041-3

Linstone, H. & Turloff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. London, UK: Addison-Wesley

Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications.

Green B., Jones M., Hughes D., & Willimas A. (1999). Applying the Delphi technique in a study of GP's information requirements. Health and Social Care in the Community, 7(3), 198-205.

Robertson, S. and F. Kitigawa 2009. ‘Understanding knowledge mediation strategies in university incubators: from policy to practice, and back again', University of Bristol.

Skulmoski, G. & Hartman, F. (2002). The Delphi method: Researching what does not exist (yet). Proceedings of the International Research Network on Organization by Projects, IRNOP V Conference, Renesse, Netherlands.

Molas-Gallart, J., A. Salter, P. Patel, A. Scott and X. Duran 2002. Measuring third stream activities:final report to the Russell Group of universities, Science and Technology Policy Research Unit,University of Sussex,

Pakistan IPO Summit, 2013 edition ; www.safeasia.com/IPO2013/docs/IPO2013

McKenna, H.P. (1994). The Delphi technique: a worthwhile approach for nursing?. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 1221-1225.

Beech B.F. (1997). Studying the future: a Delphi survey of how multi-disciplinary clinical staff view the likely development of two community mental health centers over the course of the next two years. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 331-338.

Spilling, O.R. (2004). Commercialization of knowledge–conceptual framework. 13th Nordic Conference on Small Business (NCSB) Research, Tromsø.

Vernon, J. 2010. ‘The end of the public universityEngland’,GlobalHigherEd(http://globalhighered.wordpress.com/).Thrift, N. 2011. ‘Across the world: the of higher education’, The Chronicle of Higher Education .

Tapio, P., Paloniemi, R., Varho, V., & Vinnari, M. (2011). The unholy marriage? Integrating qualitative and quantitative information in Delphi processes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.016

Downloads

Published

2017-04-06

Issue

Section

Articles