Critical Review Of Reading Model And Theories In First And Second Language

Authors

  • Dr. Zaidah Zainal Department of Modern Language Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Abstract

Reading models have been much discussed by researchers and language practitioners to explain the cognitive processes which occur in a reader's mind. Because reading is a silent and internal process, much is left inknown. In this paper, the writer attemps to critically discuss the different views of reading processes, from the perspectives of first language (L1) and second language (L2). These views are modelled into two classes, the process and componential models. Further discussion of L2 reading is also provided in the llight of whether L2 reading is a language or reading problem. To provide further insights into the cognitive processes of a reader, two types of hypothesis commonly used to explain the complexities involved in L2 reading are reviewed, the language interpendence hypothesis and the language threshold hypothesis.

References

Anderson, J.C. 1984. Reading in a foreign language: a reading problem or a language problem? In J.C. Alderson and A.H. Urquhart (Eds.). Reading in a Foreign Language. (1-24). London: Longman

Alderson, J.C. 2000. Assessing Reading. Cambridge University Press.

Bernhardt, E.B. 1986. Reading in the foreign language. In B.H. Wing (ed.), Listening, Reading and Writing: Analysis and Application. (93-115). Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.

Bernhardt, E.B. 1991a. Reading Development in a Second Language. Norwood, NJ. Ablex.

Bernhardt, E.B. 1991b. A psycholinguistic perspective on second language literacy. In J.H. Hulstijn and J.F. Matter (Eds.), Reading in Two Languages, AILA Review 8, (31-44). (Amsterdam).

Bernhardt, E.B., and Kamil, M.L. 1995. Interpreting relationships between LI and L2 reading: consolidating the linguistic threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 16,1, 15-34.

Block, E. 1986. The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20,3, 463-494.

Block, E. 1992. See how they read: comprehension monitoring of LI and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26,2,319-340

Bossers, B. 1991. On the thresholds, ceiling, and short circuits: the relation between L1 reading in Two Languages, AILA Review, 8, (45-60) (Amsterdam).

Carrel, P.L., and Eisterhold, J.C. 1988. Scheme theory and ESL reading pedagogy. In P.L. Carrell, J. Devine and D.E. Eskey (eds.), Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. (73-92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clapham, C. 1996. The Development of IELTS: A Study of the Effect of Background Knowldege on Reading Comprehension. Cambridge University Press.

Coady, J. 1979. A psycholinguistic model of the ESL reader. In R. Mackay, B. Barkman and R.R. Jordan (Eds.), Reading in a Second Language. (5-12). Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.

Cummins, J. 1991. Interdependence of first-and second-language proficiency in bilingual children. In E. Bialystok, (Ed.), Language Processing in Bilingual Children. (70-890). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eskey, D.E. 1988. Holding in the bottom: an interactive approach to the language problems of second language readers. In P.L. Carrell, J. Devine and D.E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. (93-100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eskey, D.E., and Grabe, W. 1988. Interactive models for second language reading: perspectives on instruction. In P.L. Carrell, J. Devine and D.E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. (223-238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Geva, E., and Ryan, E.B. 1993. Linguistic and cognitive correlates of academic skills in first and second languages. Language Learning, 43,1,5-24

Goodman, K.S. 1975. Language and Literacy: The Selected Writings of Kenneth Goodman. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Goodman, K.S. 1988. The reading process. In P.L. Carrell, J. Devine and D.E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. (11-21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gough, P.B. 1972. One second of reading. In J.F. Kavanagh and I.G. Mattingley (Eds.), Language by Ear and by Eye. (331-358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Grabe, W. 1991. Current development in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25,3,375-406.

Hassan, F. 1999. Language, Reading, Discourse and Metacognitive Influences on the Reading Strategies of Malaysian Secondary School Children in L1 and L2. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. The University of Manchester.

Hoover, W.A., and Tumer, W.E. 1993. The components of reading. In G.B. Thompson, W.E. Tunmer and T. Nicolson (Eds.), Reading Acquisition Processes. (1-19). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Horiba, Y. 1990. Narrative comprehension processes: A study of native and non-native readers of Japanese. The Modern Language Journal, 74,2,188-202.

Horiba, Y. 1996. Comprehension processes in L2 reading: language competence, textual coherence and inferences. SSLA, 18,433-473.

Kobeil, M. 1999. The Influence of Content Domain Knowledge on the Reading Strategies and Reading Comprehension of Tertiary Level Readers of English as a Foreign Language. Unpublished Ph.D.Thesis. The University of Machester.

LaBerge, D., and Samuels, S.J. 1974. Twards a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6,293-323.

Lee, J.F., and Schallert, D.L. 1997. The relative contribution of L2 languageproficiency and L1 reading ability to L2 reading performance: A test of the threshold hypothesis in an EFL context. TESOL Quarterly, 30,4,713-739.

Paran, A. 1996. Models and Theories of L2 Reading. Paper presented at the University of Reading, Centre for Applied Language Studies, Oct. 29 1996.

Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A. 1989. The Psychology of Reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Rumelhart, D.E. 1990. Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and Performance. VI (573-603.

Samuels, S.J., and Eisenberg, P. 1981. A framework for understanding the reading process. In F.J. Pirozzolo and M.C. Wittrock (eds.), Neuropsychological and Cognitive Processes in Reading. (31-67). New York: Academic Press.

Samuels, S.J., and Kamil, M.L. 1988. Models of the reading process. In P.L. Carrell, J. Devine and D.E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. (22-36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stanovich, K.E. 1980. Toward an interactive compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Reseach Quarterlu, 19,1,32-71.

Urquhart, S., Weir, C. 1998. Reading in a Second Language: Process, Product and Practice. London: Longman.

Yoon, H.K, and Goetz, E.T. 1994. Context effects on word recognition and reading comprehension of poor and good readers: a test of the interactive-compensatory hypothesis. Reading Research Quarter, 29'1'179-186.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-06

How to Cite

Zainal, D. Z. (2017). Critical Review Of Reading Model And Theories In First And Second Language. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 1(2). Retrieved from https://jurnalkemanusiaan.utm.my/index.php/kemanusiaan/article/view/223

Issue

Section

Articles