Factors Influencing The Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)

Authors

  • Abu Bakar Abd. Hamid Faculty of Management and Human Resource Development Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Melati Ahmad Anuar Faculty of Management and Human Resource Development Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Gengeswari K. Faculty of Business and Accountancy INTI International University College, Nilai

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) implementation is viewed as an important tool for transmission of business data.  Yet, its implementation has not reached the predicted level whereby the implementation is often stalled at infancy stage.  Many factors were pinpointed as inhibitors or barriers for success of EDI implementation.  This study examines key EDI influencing factors and their relationship with implementation level, firm size and type of users. Mail surveys on 108 manufacturers were the main data collection method. Findings indicate that implementation level differs based on influencing factors, while these factors differ based on type of users and do not differ based on firm size.  Relatively, internal factors were found to be more significant than external factors.  This study also recommends future research to further examine influences of users’ type with different EDI aspects.

References

Aguila-Obra, A.R.D. and Padilla-Melendez, A. (2006). Organizational factors affecting internet technology adoption. Internet Research. 16(1): 94-110.

Angeles, R., Ravinder Nath and Hendon, W.D. (1998). An empirical investigation of the level electronic data interchange (EDI) implementation and its ability to predict EDI system success measures and EDI implementation factors. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics. 28(9): 773-793.

Arunachalam, V. (1995). EDI: An analysis of adoption, uses, benefits and barriers. Journal of Systems Management. 46(2): 60-64.

Behrens, S., Jamieson, K., Jones, D. and Cranston, M. (2005). Predicting system success using the technology acceptance model: a case study. 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Nov 9 – Dec 2. Sydney.

Bergeron, F. and Raymond, L. (1997). Managing EDI for corporate advantage: a longitudinal study. Information and Management. 31: 319-333.

Brandyberry, A. A. (2003). Determinants of adoption for organizational innovations approaching saturation. European Journal of Innovation Management. 6(3): 150-158.

Chan, C. and Swatman, P.M.C. (1998). EDI implementation: a broader perspective. “Bled ’98â€- 11th International Conference on Electronic Commerce. June 8-10. Bled, Slovenia: 90-108.

Chau, Y. K. (2001). Inhibitors to EDI adoption in small businesses: an empirical investigation. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research. 2(2): 78-88.

Chau, Y. K. and Jim, C. F. (2002). Adoption of electronic data interchange in small and medium enterprises. Journal of Global Information Management. 10(4): 61-85.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 13: 319-340.

Elbaz, D. (1998). Electronic data interchange: an assessment of the factors leading to EDI adoption. Concordia University: Master Thesis.

Emmelhainz, M. A. (1994). Electronic data interchange in logistics. in: robeson, f.j. and copacino C.W. (1994). The Logistics Handbook. New York: The Free Press: 737766.

Fillis, I., Johannson, U. and Wagner, B. (2004). Factors impacting on e-businesses adoption and development in the smaller firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research. 10(5): 178-191.

Heck, E. V and Ribbers, P. M. (1999). The adoption and impact of edi in dutch SMEs. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Iacovou, C.L., Benbasat, I. and Dexter, A.S. (1995). Electronic data interchange and small organizations. Adoption and Impact of Technology. MIS Quarterly. 19(4): 465-485.

Jimenez-Martinez, J. and Polo-Redondo (2004). The influence of EDI adoption over its perceived benefits. Technovation. 24:73-79.

Jun, M. and Cai, S. (2003). Key obstacles to EDI success: from the us small manufacturing companies’ perspective. Industrial Management and Data Systems. 103(3): 192-203.

Kuan, K. Y and Chau, Y. K. (2001). A perception model for edi adoption in small businesses using a technology-organization-environment framework. Information & Management. 38(1): 507-521.

Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P. and Zhuang, Y. (2000). The technology acceptance model and the world wide web. Decision Support Systems. 29(3): 269-282.

Leng Ang, C., Razman, M.T. and Rusdi, M. (2003). An empirical study on electronic commerce diffusion in the Malaysian shipping industry. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries. 14(1): 1-9.

Lu, J. E. and Hwang, R. I. (2001). A distributed EDI model. The Journal of Systems and Software. 56: 1-7.

Lummus, R. R. and Duclos, L. K. (1995). Implementation of EDI systems. Journals of System Management. 45(5): 4-10.

Mackay, D. and Rosier, M. (1996). measuring organizational benefits of EDI diffusion - A case of the Australian automotive industry. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management. 26(10): 60-78.

Mitropoulos, P. and Tatum, C. B. (2000). Forces driving adoption of new information technologies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 126 (5): 340348.

Money, W. (2004). application of technology acceptance model to a knowledge management system. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Mukhopadhyay, T. and Kekre, S. (2002). Strategic and operational benefits of electronic integration in b2b procurement processes. Management Science. 48(10). 1301-1313.

Ngai, E. W. T. and Gunasekaran, A. (2004). Implementation of EDI in Hong Kong: an empirical analysis. Industrial Management and Data Systems. 104(1): 88-100.

Parker, C. M. and Swatman, P. M. C. (1997). The importance of EDI education: a survey of Australian SMEs.

Parsa, A. and Popa, S. (2003). Analysis of EDI success implementation factors and their interrelationship with the level of EDI implementation within Swedish companies. Goterborg University: Master Thesis.

Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K. and Nilakanta, S. (1994). Implementation of electronic data interchange: an innovation diffusion perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems. 1(2): 157-186.

Seyal, A. H. and Rahim, M. M. (2006). A Preliminary investigation of electronic data interchange adoption in Bruneian small business organizations. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries. 24(4): 1-21.

Strait Shipper. Stop Fiddling Around, EDI Player Told. 27/3/95.

Sunyeen, P. (2000). A model of e-business adoption by small businesses: From electronic data interchange (EDI) to the Internet. University of Hawaii: PhD Thesis.

Swatman, P.M.C and Swatman, P.A (1992). Electronic data interchange: organizational opportunity, not technical problem. “DBIS’ 91†2nd Australian Conference on Database and Information Systems. February 2- 3. University of New South Wales.

Teo, T. S. H., Lim, V. K. G. and Lai, R. Y. C. (1999). intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in internet usage UNESCAP. Omega. 27(1): 25-37.

United Nation of Economic and Social Commission for Asia and Pacific. (1996). Electronic Data Interchange – A Management Overview.

Vlachos, I.P. (2002). Paradigms of the factors that impinge upon business-to-business ecommerce evaluation. International Journal of Business and Economics. 2(1): 82-89.

Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L. and Xu, S. (2002). a cross country study of electronic business adoption using the technology-organization-environment framework. 23rd International Conference on Information Systems.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-06

How to Cite

Abd. Hamid, A. B., Ahmad Anuar, M., & K., G. (2017). Factors Influencing The Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI). Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 6(1). Retrieved from https://jurnalkemanusiaan.utm.my/index.php/kemanusiaan/article/view/185

Issue

Section

Articles