Determining TQM Practices in University R&D Activities using Factor Analysis: Research Experience of Malaysian Universities

Authors

  • Ahmad Jusoh Fakulti Pengurusan dan Pembangunan Sumber Manusia Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Rushami Zien Yusoff Fakulti Pengurusan Teknologi Universiti Utara Malaysia
  • Shahimi Mohtar Fakulti Pengurusan Teknologi Universiti Utara Malaysia

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Overall, this paper discusses the applicability of TQM and proposes a theoretical framework of TQM to suit the need of the Research and Development (R&D) context. The dimensions for the framework were based on the previous empirical studies, the evaluation criteria of world standard criteria such as MBNQA, EFQM, and QMS ISO 9000, and quality concept from the experts. In order to understand the TQM practices in R&D environment, this paper addresses the need for the study from the university researchers’ perspective. Data were collected through a large-scale mail survey from academic researchers of four Malaysian Research Universities. The constructs of TQM practices were validated and determined using factor analysis. The findings from this study suggest that the seven dimensions i.e. top management leadership, data and information management, performance management, process management, partnership, customer focus and resource management are sufficient to explain the TQM practices in R&D context.

References

ArrindeLL, W.A., Van de Ende, J. (1985). An empirical test of the utility of the observation-to-variables ratio in factor and components analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9: 165-178.

Baldrige. (2006). Baldrige national quality program-criteria for performance excellence. Retrieved 20 Sept, 2006, from http://www.quality.nist.gov

Behara, R. S., and Gundersen, D. E. (2001). Analysis of quality management practices in services. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 18 (6): 584-603.

Besterfield, D. H., Besterfield-Michna, C., Berterfield, G. H., and Besterfield-Scare, M. (2003). Total Quality Management (3 ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Birley, S. (2003). University, academics and spinout companies: lesson from imperial. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1(1): 1-21.

Black, S. A., and Porter, L. J. (1996). Identification of the critical factors of TQM. Decision Sciences, 27(1): 1-21.

Bolton, A. (1995). A rose by any other name: TQM in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 3(2): 13-18.

Boselie, P., and Wiele, T. V. D. (2002). Employee perceptions of HRM and TQM and the effects on satisfaction and intention to leave. Managing Service Quality, 12 (3): 165-172.

Calvo-Mora, A., Leal, A., and Roldan, J. L. (2006). Using enablers of the EFQM model to manage institutions of higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 14(2): 99-122.

Carlsson, B., and Fridh, A.C. (2000). Technology transfer in United State universities. A Survey and statistical analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12: 199-232.

Chang, C., Chen, M. H., Hua, M., and Yang, P. Y. (2005). Industrialization academic knowledge in Taiwan. Research Technology Management, 48(4): 45-50.

Clarke, T.E. (2002). Unique features of an R&D work environment and research scientists and engineers. Knowledge, Technology and Policy, 15(3): 58-69.

Comrey, A. L., and Lee, H.B. (1992). A first course in fator analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cooper, D.R., and Schindler, P.S. (2000). Business research method (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Crosby, P.B. (1979). Quality is free: The art of making quality certain. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Deming, W.E. (1982). Quality, productivity and competitive position. Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

EFQM. (2006). The fundamental concepts of excellence. Retrieved 24 Sept, 2006, from http://www.quality-foundation.co.uk

Elmuti, D., Kathawala, Y., and Manippallil, M. (1996). Are total quality management programmes in higher education worth the effort? International Journal of Quality and Realibility Management, 13 (6): 29-44.

Forza, C. (2002). Survey research in operations management: a process-based perspective. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22(2): 152-194.

Franklin, S.J., Wright, M., and Lockett, A. (2001). Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26: 127-141.

Friedman, J., and Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: Do incentives, management and location matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 28: 17-30.

Froman, R.D. (2001). Elements to consider in planning the use of factor analysis. Southern Online Journal of Nursing Research, 2(5): 1-22.

George, D., and Malley, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Gitlow, H.S., Oppenheim, A.J., Oppenheim, R., and Levine, D.M. (2005). Quality Management (3rd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.

Goersch, D.L., and Davis, S.B. (2003). Quality management: introduction to total quality management for production, processing and services (4th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Goldfarb, B., Henrekson, M. (2003). Botton-up versus top down policies towards the commercialization of universities intellectual property. Research Policy, 32: 639-658.

Hair, J. F., Jr, Babin, B., Money, A. H., and Samouel, P. (2003). Essential of business research methods. New Jersey: John Wiley and Son, Inc.

Hair, J. F., Jr, Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hasan, H. (1999). Effective information for managers: using multi-dimensional data structures to support research management. Retrieved Sept 8, 2006, from http://www2.vuw.ac.nc/acis99/Papers/PaperHasan-034.pdf

Heininger, S.A. (1988). R&D and competitiveness: what leader must do. Research Technology Management, 31 (6): 6-7.

Hemlin, S. (2006). Managing creativity in academic research. Science Studies, 1: 83-92.

Hemlin, S., and Gustafsson, M. (1996). Research production in the arts and humanities: a questionnaire study of factors influencing research performance. Scientometrics, 37 (3): 417-431.

Ho, S.K., and Wearn, K. (1995). A TQM model for higher education and training. Training for Quality, 3 (2): 25-33.

Houghton, J.W. (2005). Changing research practices and research infrastructure development. Higher Education Management and Policy, 17 (1): 1-19.

Ishikawa, K. (1985). What is total quality control? Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

ISO 9000. (2006). Quality management principle. Retrieved 20 Sept, 2006, from http:www.iso.org/iso/en/iso9000-14000/understand/qmp.html

Johnston, S., and Mccormack, C. (1997). Developing research potential through a structured mentoring program: issues arising. Higher Education, 33: 251-264.

Juran, J. M. (1988a). Juran’s quality control handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Juran, J. M. (1988b). Quality control handbook (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Kanji, G.K., and Tambi, A.M.A. (1999). Total quality management in UK higher education institutions. Total Quality management, 10(1): 129-153.

Kirkland, J. (2005). Towards an integrated approach: university research management in an institutional context. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 4 (3): 155-166.

Koch, V.J. (2003). TQM: why is its impact in higher education so small? The TQM Magazine, 15(5): 325-333.

Korunka, C., Carayon, P., Sainfort, F., Scharitzer, D., and Hoonakker, P. (2003). Quality in public sector from an employee's perspective: results from a transnational comparison. Total Quality management, 14 (5): 537-548.

Lee, Y.S. (1996). Technology transfer and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 25: 843-863.

Lembaga Akrediatasi Negara. (2006). Kod amalan jaminan kualiti IPTA di Malaysia. Retrieved 18 July, 2006, from http://www.lan.gov.my

Liu, H., and Jiang, Y. (2001). Technology transfer from higher education institution to industry in China: nature and implications. Technovation, 21: 175-188.

Logar, C. M., Ponzurick, T. G., Spears, J. R., and France, K. R. (2001). Commercializing intelectual property: a university-industry alliance for new product development. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 10 (4): 206-217.

MASTIC. (2004). National survey of research and development: 2004 report. Kuala Lumpur: MASTIC.

Meyers, L.S., Gamst, G., and Guarino, A.J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. California, USA: Sage Publication, Inc.

Nunnally, J.C., and Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). new York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Oakland, J.S. (2004). Oakland on quality management. London: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.

Oii, K.L., Veeri, A., Yin, L.K., and Vellapan, L.S. (2006). Relationships of TQM practices and employees’ propensity to remain: an empirical case study. The TQM Magazine, 18 (5): 528-541.

O’Shea, R., Allen, T.J., O’Gorman, C., and Roche, F. (2004). Universities and technology transfer: a review of academic entrepreneurship literature. Irish Journal of Management, 25 (2): 11-29.

Osseo-Asare, A.E., Jr, and Longbottom, D. (2002). The need for education and training in the use of the EFQM model for quality management in UK higher education institutions. Quality Assurance in Education, 10 (1): 26-36.

Owen-Smith, J., and Powel, W.W. (2001). To patent or not: Faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26 (99-114).

Owlia, M.S., and Aspinwall, E.M. (1997). TQM in higher education-a review. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 14(5): 527-543.

Owlia, M.S., and Aspinwall, E.M. (1998). A Framework for measuring quality in engineering education. Total Quality management, 9 (6): 501-518

Prajogo, D.I., and Sohal, A.S. (2006). The integration of TQM and technology/R&D management in determining quality and innovation performance. The International Journal of Management Science, 34: 296-312.

Pratt, M., Margaritis, D., and Coy, D. (1999). Developing a research culture in a university faculty. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 1 (1): 43-55.

Roa, A., Carr, L. P., Dambolena, I., Koop, R. J., Martin, J., Rafii, F. (1996). Total quality management: A cross-functional perspective. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Samson, D., and Terziovski, M. (1999). The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance. Journal of Operation Management, 17 (4): 393-409.

Santoro, M.D., and Gopalakrisnan, S. (2001). Relationship dinamik between university research centers and industrial firms: Their impact on technology transfer activities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26: 163-171.

Saraph, J.V., Benson, P.G., and Schroeder, R.G. (1989). An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management. Decision Sciences, 20 (4): 457-478.

Scmitdt, E.K., Graversen, E.K., and Langberg, K. (2003). Innovation and dynamics in public research environment in Denmark: a research-policy perspective. Science and Public Policy, 30 (2): 107-116.

Sekaran, U. (2003). Research method for business: a skill-building approach (4 ed.). new York: John Wiley and Sons.

Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D., Atwater, L.E., and Link, A. (2004). Towards a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of universities technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21: 115-142.

Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D., Atwater, L.E., and Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32: 27-48.

Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D., Atwater, L.E., and Link, A. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14: 111-133.

Stackhouse, J., and Day, R. (2005). Global and regional practices in university research management. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 4(3): 189-205.

Steele, L. W. (1988). Selecting R&D programs and objectives. Research Technology Management, 31 (2): 17-36.

Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for social sciences (4th ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Taguchi, G. (1986). Introduction to quality engineering. Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organization.

Thursby, J. G., Jensen, R., and Thursby, M. C. (2001). Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2): 59-72.

Weggeman, M. P., and Groeneveld, M. J. (2005). Applying the business excellence model to a research organization. Research Technology Management, 48 (4): 9-13.

Winn, B. A., and Cameron, K. S. (1998). Organizational quality: an examination of the Malcolm Baldrige national quality framework. Research in Higher Education, 39(5): 491-512.

Youssef, M.A., Libby, P., Al-Khafaji, A., and Sawyer, G.J. (1998). TQM implementation barriers in higher education. International Journal of Technology Management, 16(4/5/6): 584-593.

Zairi, M. (1994). Leadership in TQM implementation. The TQM Magazine, 6 (6): 9-16.

Zeitz, G., Johanneson, R., and Ritchie, J.E. (1997). An employee survey measuring total quality management practices and culture-development and validation. Group and Organization Management, 22 (4): 414-444.

Zink, K.J., and Schmidt, A. (1995). Measuring universities against the European quality award criteria. Total Quality Management, 6(5&6): 547-561.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-06

How to Cite

Jusoh, A., Yusoff, R. Z., & Mohtar, S. (2017). Determining TQM Practices in University R&D Activities using Factor Analysis: Research Experience of Malaysian Universities. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 6(1). Retrieved from https://jurnalkemanusiaan.utm.my/index.php/kemanusiaan/article/view/184

Issue

Section

Articles