KESAN PENGGUNAAN PETA KONSEP DAN PEMBELAJARAN KOPERATIF TERHADAP PRESTASI PELAJAR DALAM MATA PELAJARAN SEJARAH TINGKATAN EMPAT

Authors

  • Mohan Rathakrishnan Sekolah Menengah Jit Sin Pulau Pinang
  • Balan Rathakrishnan Sekolah Psikologi dan Kerja Sosial Universiti Malaysia Sabah

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This article attempts to examine the effectiveness of the use of concept map cognitive strategies and cooperative learning to improve comprehension, short-term knowledge, and ability to solve a given problem based on the topics taught in the form of essay questions at the end of the lesson or test for Form Four History subject. This study also aims to see the difference in performance between male and female students who use concept map cognitive strategies and cooperative learning than male and female students who do not use cooperative learning. A total of 60 students from secondary schools in Penang were taken as a sample. This study used a quasi-experiment with a 2x2 factorial design involving t-test at a 0.05 significance level. The results showed that students who learn to use concept maps learning strategies and cooperative approach can improve performance achievement in the subject of history. Students not only can improve the understanding of the topic being taught, but also can use the new knowledge gained from cooperative learning to solve problems with more confidence. Therefore, learning using concept maps and cooperative strategy is proposed to be practiced in the teaching and learning of History subject in form 4.


ABSTRAK  

Artikel ini cuba mengkaji mengenai keberkesanan penggunaan strategi kognitif peta konsep dan pembelajaran koperatif untuk meningkatkan kefahaman, pengetahuan jangka pendek, kemampuan menyelesaikan masalah yang diberi berdasarkan topik yang diajar dalam bentuk soalan esei pada akhir sesi pengajaran atau ujian bagi mata pelajaran Sejarah tingkatan empat. Kajian ini juga ingin melihat perbezaan pencapaian antara pelajar lelaki dan perempuan yang menggunakan strategi kognitif peta konsep dan pembelajaran koperatif berbanding pelajar lelaki dan perempuan yang tidak menggunakan pembelajaran koperatif. Seramai 60 pelajar dari Sekolah Menengah di Pulau Pinang diambil sebagai sampel kajian. Kajian ini menggunakan eksperimen kuasi dengan rekabentuk faktorial 2x2 yang melibatkan ujian-t pada paras signifikan 0.05. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa pelajar yang belajar menggunakan strategi pembelajaran peta konsep dan pendekatan koperatif dapat meningkatkan prestasi pencapaian dalam mata pelajaran Sejarah. Pelajar bukan sahaja dapat meningkatkan kefahaman terhadap topik yang diajar, malah dapat menggunakan pengetahuan yang baru diperolehi daripada pembelajaran secara koperatif untuk menyelesaikan masalah dengan lebih yakin. Oleh itu, pembelajaran menggunakan peta konsep dan strategi koperatif adalah dicadangkan untuk diamalkan dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran Sejarah tingkatan 4.    

References

Andersan-Inman, L. & Zeitz, L., (1993). Computer-Based Concept-Mapping: Activity studying for active learning.

Anderson, J.R., (1995). Cognitive Psychology and its Implications (4th ed.). New York: Freeman.

Anderson, R.C., & Pearson, P. D., (1984). A Schematheoretic View of Basic Processess in Reading Comprehension. Handbook of Reading Reasearch. New York: Longman.

Anderson, R.C., Reynolds, R.E., Schallert, D.L. and Goetz, E.T., (1977). Frameworks for Comprehending Discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14: 376-382.

Ausebel, D.P., (1968). The Use of Advance Organizers in the Learning and Retention of Meaningful Verbal Material, Journal of Education Psychology, 51(2).

Baddeley, A.D., (1986). Working Memory: Theory and Practice. London: Oxford University Press.

Barlett, F.C., (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

David, W.J., (1975). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperation, Competition and Individualization, University of Minnesota, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Dowhower, S.L., (1999). Supporting a Strategic Stance in the Classroom: A Comprehension Framework for Helping Teachers Help Students to be Strategic. The Reading Teacher, 52.

Gagne, R.M., (1996). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction, New York: CBS Publishing Asia Ltd.

Guilford, J.P., (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hiebert, J. and Carpenter, T.P., (1992). Learning and Teaching with Understanding. in D.A. Grouws (ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, New York: Macmillan.

Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, S., (1972). The Effects of Attitude Similarity Expectation of Goal Facilitation and Actual Goal Facilitation on Interpersonal Attraction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8.

Johnson, E.J., (1988). Expertise and Decision Under Uncertainty: Performance and Process. in M. Chir. Glaser and M. Farr (eds.), The Nature of Expertise, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

Johnson, S. and Johnson, D.W., (1972). The Effects of Other’s Actions, Attitude Similarity, Race on Attraction Towards Others. Human Relations, 25.

Kelly, A.V., (1978). Mixed-Ability Grouping: Theory and Practice, London: Harper & Row Publishers.

Mandler, J., (1984). Stories, Scripts, and Scenes: Aspects of Scheme Theory. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

Molly, L. dan Khadijah Zon, (1996). Kajian Minat Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Sains, Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Norman, D., (1982). Learning and Memory. San Francisco: Freeman.

Novak, J.D. and Gowin, D.B., (1984). Learning How to Learn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Palmer, M. and Batho, G., (1981), The Source Method in History Teaching, Historical Association, TH 48, A Practical Introduction to the Preparation and Use of Sources in the Classroom.

Perkins, D.N. and Solomon, G., (1989). Are Cognitive Skills Context Bound? Educational Researcher, 18.

Peterson, L.R. and Peterson, M.J., (1959). Short-term Tetention of Individual Verbal Items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58 .

Piaget, J., (1929). The Child’s Conception of the World. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.

Ross, B. and Munby, H., (1991). Concept Mapping and Misconceptions: A Study of High-school Students Understanding of Acids and Bases. International Journal of Science Education, 13(1).

Rumelhart, D. and Norman, D., (1978). Accretion, Tuning and Restructuring: Three Modes of Learning . Semantic Factors in Cognition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

Rumelhart, D. and Norman, D., (1981). Analogical Processes in Learning. in J.R. Anderson (ed.), Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

Santhiram, R., (1978), The Deveploment of History Teaching in Schools In Peninsula Malaysia (1905-1978). Can Examination of the Syllabuses & Textbook. Disember 1970, Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Skinner, B.F., (1953). Science and Human Behavior, New York: Macmillan.

Slavin, R.E., (1989). School and Classroom Organisation, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

Snyder, C.R., (1995). Conceptualizing, Measuring and Nurturing Hope. Journal of Counselling & Development, 73.

Spence K. and Spence J., (eds.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 2, New York: Academic Press.

Stahl, Robert J. and R.L. van Sickle, (eds.)(1992). Cooperative Learning in the Social Studies Classroom: An Invitation to Social Study. Washington: Social Studies.

Steven N. Trautwein., (2000). Using Concep Maps As Cooperative Learning Activities To Explore Hemodynmaic Principles, Southeast Missouri State University.

Thelen, H.A., (1967). Classroom Grouping For Teachability, US: John Wiley & Sons.

Watts, D.G., (1972). The Learning of History, London: Routledge & Kogan Paul.

Webb, N.M., (1991). Task-Related Verbal Interaction and Mathematics Learning in Small Group, Journal for Research in Mathematics Educations, 22(5).

Barlett, F.C., (1958). Thinking. New York: Basic Books.

Bond, G.L. and Dykstra, R., (1967). The Cooperative Research Program in First Grade Reading Instruction. Reading Research Q uaterly, 2(4).

Brown, A.L. and Day, J.D., (1983). Macrorules for Summarizing Texts: The Development of Expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22.

Bruner, J., (1960). The Process of Education. US: Harvard University Press.

Bruning, R.H., Schraw, G.J. and Ronning, R.R., (1999). Cognitive Psychology and Instruction (Third Edition), New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Campbell, D.T & Stanley, J.C (1963). Experimental an Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.

Chang, K.E., Sung, Y.T., Chen, I.D., (2003), The Effect of Concept Mapping to Enchance Text Comprhension and Summarization, The Journal of Experimental Education, Washington; Fall.

Cohen, E.G., (1982). Sex as a Status Characteristics in a Cooperative Math-Science Curriculum, Paper presented at the Conference of International Association for the Study of Cooperation in Education, Provo, Utah, July.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-06

How to Cite

Rathakrishnan, M., & Rathakrishnan, B. (2017). KESAN PENGGUNAAN PETA KONSEP DAN PEMBELAJARAN KOPERATIF TERHADAP PRESTASI PELAJAR DALAM MATA PELAJARAN SEJARAH TINGKATAN EMPAT. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 3(2). Retrieved from https://jurnalkemanusiaan.utm.my/index.php/kemanusiaan/article/view/148

Issue

Section

Articles