HUMAN CAPITAL: A CRITIQUE

Authors

  • Rossilah Jamil Faculty of Management and Human Resource Development Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Human Capital Theory argues that a person’s formal education determines his or her earning power. This article seeks to highlight the discrepancies surrounding the notion that education should be construed as a direct form of investment in one’s financial future. An analysis of the use of quantitative techniques in measuring human capital, particularly the full/ elaborate and the regression methods is presented. The ways in which returns are measured by using the full/elaborate method and regression method are explained and a critical assessment of their applications is discussed. There are several reasons to dispute the nation that one’s education influences earnings. The first is that non-educational factors also influence earnings. Secondly, there are weaknesses in the way ‘benefits’ and ‘costs’ of education in Human Capital research are defined. Thirdly, there is scepticism of the indicators of social benefits claimed to have resulted from investment in education. Fourthly, limitations of data sources generally used in Human Capital research tend to distort reality. And finally, weaknesses are inherent in the way that Human Capital research is conducted due to its nature as an economic research.

References

Ashenfelter. In G. Psacharopoulos. 1994. “Return to Investment in Education: A Global Updateâ€, World Development. 22 (9): 1325-1343.

Becker, G.S., 1993. Human Capital: A Theoritical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education. London: The University of Chicago Press.

Bryman, A., 1988. Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Routledge.

Chevalier, A. and Walker, I., in Harmon, C., et al. (eds.), 2001. Educational and Earnings in Europe: A Cross Country Analysis of the Returns of Education. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Christensen, J.J. and Westergaard-Nielsen N., in Harmon, C, et al. (eds.), 2001. Educational and Earnings in Europe: A Cross Country Analysis of the Returns of Education. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Kuznets, S., 1972. Quantitative Econimic Research: Trends and Problems. NBER.

Marsh, C., 1984. “Problems with Surveys: Method or Epistemology?â€, in

Bulmer, M (ed.) Sociological Research Methods. London: MacMillan Education Ltd. 82-102. 2nd edition.

May, T., 1997. Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process. Buckingham: Open University Press. 2nd edition.

Mincer, J., 1974. Schooling, Experience and Earnings. (NBER).

OECD., 1998. Human Capital Investment: An International Comparison.

OECD., 2001. The Well-being of Nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital-Education and Skills.

Psacharopoulos, G.., 1981. Returns to Education: An Update International Comparison, in Blaug, M., (1992) The Economic Value of Education. England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Smits, J., Odink, J. and Hartog, J., 2001. Netherlands, in Harmon, C. et al. (eds.), Educational and Earnings in Europe: A Cross Country Analysis of the Returns of Education. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-06

How to Cite

Jamil, R. (2017). HUMAN CAPITAL: A CRITIQUE. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 2(2). Retrieved from https://jurnalkemanusiaan.utm.my/index.php/kemanusiaan/article/view/133

Issue

Section

Articles