Does Government Spending Crowd Out Private Consumption in Malaysia
Abstract
This paper investigates the relationship between government spending and private consumption in Malaysia. The empirical results show that: first, in Malaysia, government spending and private consumption are best described as complementary rather than as substitutes. So, this paper rejects the arguments that there is a significant degree of substitutability between government spending and private consumption. Private consumption cannot be held responsible for any crowding-out effects that government spending might have on aggregate demand. Second, in Malaysia, the tax variable is significantly different from zero. So, the rejection of Ricardian equivalence is confirmed statistically. Therefore, demand management policies, especially expansionary fiscal policy should be continued to foster economic growth.References
Ahmed, S., (1986). Temporary and permanent government spending in an open economy: some evidence for the United Kingdom. Journal of Monetary Economics.17: 197-224.
Aiyagari, S., Rao, L., Christiano, J., and Eichenbaum M. (1992). The output, employment, and interest rates effects of government consumption. Journal of Monetary Economics. 30: 73-86.
Arestis, P. (1979). The “crowding-out†of private expenditure by fiscal actions: An empirical investigation. Public Finance. 34(1): 36-49.
Aschauer, D. A. (1985). Fiscal Policy and Aggregate Demand. American Economic Review. 75(1): 117-127.
Bailey, M. J. (1971). National Income and the Price Level, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bajo-Rubio, O., DÃaz-Roldan, C., and Esteve, V. (2006). Is the budget deficit sustainable when fiscal policy is non-linear? The case of Spain. Journal of Macroeconomics. 28: 596-608.
Barry, F., and Devereux, M.B. (2003). Expansionary fiscal contraction: A theoretical Exploration. Journal of Macroeconomics. 25: 1-23.
Baxter, M., and King, R. G. (1993). Fiscal policy in general equilibrium. American Economic Review. 83(3): 315-334.
Berben, R.P., and Brosens, T. (2007). The impact of government debt on private consumption in OECD countries. Economics Letters. 94: 220-225.
Bertola, G., and Drazen, A. (1993). Trigger points and budget cuts: explaining the effects of fiscal austerity. The American Economic Review. 83(1): 11-26.
Blinder, A. S., and Solow, R. M. (1973). Does Fiscal policy Matter?. Journal of Public Economics. 2:319-337.
Bohn, H. (1992). Endogenous government spending and Ricardian Equivalence. The Economic Journal. 102: 588-597.
Branson, H. B. (1987). Macroeconomic Theory and Policy, Third Edition, New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
Cárdenas, M., and Escobar, A. (1998). Saving determinants in Colombia: 1925-1994. Journal of Development Economics. 57: 5-44.
Dalamagas, B. A. (1992). Testing Ricardian Equivalence: a reconsideration. Applied Economics. 24(1): 59-69.
Dalamagas, B. A. (2000). Public sector and economic growth : The Greek experience. Applied Economics. 32: 277-288.
Darius, R. (2001). Debt neutrality: theory and evidence from developing countries. Applied Economics. 33: 49-58.
Dickey, D. A., and Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica. 49: 1057-1072.
Devereux, M.B., Head, A.C., and Lapham, B.J. (1996). Monopolistic competition, increasing returns, and the effects of government spending. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 28: 233-254.
Feldstein, M. (1982). Government deficits and aggregate demand. Journal of Monetary Economics. 9: 1-20.
Frenkel, J., and Razin, A. (1987). Fiscal policies and the world economy: An International Approach. London: The MIT Press.
Giorgioni, G., and Holden, K. (2003). Does the Ricardian Equivalence Proposition Hold in Less Developed Countries? International Review of Applied Economics. 17(2): 209-221.
Gujarati, D.N. (2003). Basic econometrics. Fourth Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
Gupta, K. L. (1992). Ricardian equivalence and crowding out in Asia. Applied Economics. 24: 19-25.
Hall, R.E. (1978). Stochastic implications of the life cycle-permanent income hypothesis: theory and evidence. Journal of Political Economy. 86(6): 971-987.
Hamori, S., and Asako, K. (1999). Government consumption and fiscal policy: some evidence from Japan. Applied Economics Letters. 6: 551-555.
Ho, T. W. (2001(a)). Consumption and government spending substitutability revisited: evidence from Taiwan. Scottish Journal of Political Economy. 48(5): 589-604.
Ho, T. W. (2001(b)). Government spending and private consumption: a panel cointegration Analysis. International Review of Economics and Finance. 10: 95-108.
Ihori, T. (1990). Government spending and private consumption. Canadian Journal of Economics. 23(1): 60-69.
Karras, G. (1994). Government spending and private consumption, some international evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 26: 9-22.
Khalid, A. M. (1996). Ricardian equivalence: empirical evidence from developing economies. Journal of Development Economics. 51: 413-432.
Kormendi, R. C. (1983). Government debt, government spending, and private sector behavior. The American Economic Review. 73(5): 994-1010.
Linnemann, L., and Schabert, A. (2004). Can fiscal spending stimulate private consumption?. Economics Letters. 82: 173-179.
López-MejÃa, A., and Ortega, J.R. (1998). Private saving in Colombia. IMF Working Paper WP/98/171 http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/wp98171.pdf .
McCulloch, J. H. (1977). The Austrian Theory of the Marginal Use and of Ordinal Marginal Utility. Zeitschrift fuer Nationaloekonomie. 37: 249-280.
Pozzi, L. (2003). Tax discounting in a high-debt economy. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 65(3): 261-282.
Schclarek, A. (2007). Fiscal policy and private consumption in industrial and developing Countries. Journal of Macroeconomics.
Volgevang, B. (2005). Econometrics: theory and applications with Eviews, UK: Pearson Addison Wesley.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, Second Edition, USA: South-Western.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Introduc
